I am trying to get my head around the way that table size changes the value of cards.
In relation to something I read :
"At a 9 man table, A6o is not a particularly great hand, and you certainly don't want to raise with it in middle position. At a 5 man table, this suddenly becomes a pretty good hand for attacking the blinds in the same position. At a 9 man table, two after the BB is middle position. At a 5 man table, two after the BB is the cutoff seat!"
I get the basic obvious fact that if you are first to act on a 5 handed table you have less people behind you so you can raise wider than if you were first to act on a 9 handed table.
My question is this:
Is there a difference between being on a 9 handed table, with the first 4 people folding, and you then being left to act with 4 people behind you ; and being on a 5 handed table and being first to act? Does the fact people have folded cards in front of you add anything to the situation that wouldn't be present in the straight forward 5 handed table?
Hope I made this clear